LexAgent
ChatGPT plugin by SWIS · Dutch and EU law, sourced
Data updated · Last checked
In directory search?Position now, the last 7 days and the #1 result.
Listing check?What to fix in the listing and how much each item adds to the listing score (55/100; category leaders average 68).
-
!
0 / 30Put a search term in the name Search rank?Directory search ranks name matches first: 53% of top-3 results have the search term in the name. Searches for a brand name itself are not tracked.The name has none of the tracked search terms.10 of 20 category leaders do this
In ChatGPT conversations?How often ChatGPT mentions LexAgent when people ask common Education & Research questions.
About LexAgent
On the directory's Education & Research page LexAgent is #670 of 679. It joined the directory on Oct 28, 2026.
LexAgent gives ChatGPT the official texts of Dutch and EU law, so answers rest on the source instead of memory. It reads, straight from the government open-data services: - National legislation from wetten.overheid.nl, article by article and for any date (peildatum).From the plugin’s directory listing
Try asking
Competitors?Plugins that show up in the same tracked searches as LexAgent.
No competitors yet.
In the directory
- Featured page
- Not on it
- Category page
- #670 of 679
- Same job
- 332 legal & compliance plugins
- Account
- Needed
- Listed since
- Oct 28, 2026
Recent changes
More Education & Research plugins
LexAgent: questions and answers
What does LexAgent do?
Dutch and EU law, sourced. LexAgent gives ChatGPT the official texts of Dutch and EU law, so answers rest on the source instead of memory. It reads, straight from the government open-data services: - National legislation from wetten.overheid.nl, article by article and for any date (peildatum).
How do I use LexAgent in ChatGPT?
Install it from the ChatGPT plugin directory, then mention @LexAgent in a chat. Its listing suggests asking “What does article 6:162 of the Dutch Civil Code say about unlawful acts? Quote the text.”, “Check the legal references in this objection letter against the official sources.” or “Which CJEU judgments interpret article 6 of the GDPR?”